spot_img
Supported byspot_img

Controversy surrounds lithium mining in Serbia: Environmental risks vs. economic benefits

The debate on lithium mining in Serbia, particularly the “Jadar” project, has sparked significant division, as highlighted during an academic discussion at the Kopaonik Business Forum. Key points from the panel discussion include the following:

  1. Environmental risks:
    • Zoran Stevanović, a professor from the Faculty of Mining and Geology, opposed lithium mining, citing environmental risks, such as water pollution and potential earthquakes. He emphasized the importance of Serbia’s water reserves in the Jadra valley, which are crucial for Belgrade and much of the country.
  2. Project feasibility:
    • Vera Dondur, a professor of Physical Chemistry, also opposed the project. She argued that the Jadar project could have significant environmental impacts, noting that lithium mining, especially in the absence of established global standards, poses unknown environmental risks. She further pointed out the potential harm to agriculture, particularly crops sensitive to the toxicity of pine, which would be involved in the project.
  3. Economic considerations:
    • Dragan Đuričin, an economics professor, presented a more balanced view, suggesting that the project could be profitable for Serbia, particularly with the potential for lithium processing and electric vehicle production. However, he also warned about the legal and financial consequences of banning the project, as Serbia might need to pay compensation to Rio Tinto due to existing contracts.
  4. Opportunity for Serbia:
    • Dinko Knežević, another mining professor, argued that Serbia should seize the opportunity to return to Europe’s mining map, claiming that Serbian laws are in line with European standards. He countered environmental concerns, stating that necessary infrastructure like embankments would mitigate risks like flooding.
  5. Final verdict:
    • Prvoslav Marjanović from the “Jaroslav Černi” Institute emphasized that the outcome depends on how Serbia negotiates the conditions of exploitation to protect its interests.

In conclusion, the debate remains unresolved, with significant concerns about the environmental and economic implications of the Jadar lithium project.

Suppported byOwner's Engineer

EBRD’s strategic investments in Serbia: Advancing green transition and sustainable development

The Western Balkans is a key market for the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), with a strong emphasis on sectors that drive...

PIO Fund alerts pensioners to fake social media scam promising account balance doubling

The Republic Pension and Disability Insurance Fund (PIO) has warned about new attempts to scam pensioners in Serbia, where fraudsters are offering to double...

One year of Open Balkans labor agreement: Challenges, results and concerns

The Agreement on free access to the labor market in the Western Balkans, part of the Open Balkans initiative, entered into force a year...
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img
error: Content is protected !!