spot_img
Supported byspot_img

Đerdap 3 hydroelectric plant: A key player for Balkan energy future

The long-awaited reversible hydroelectric plant Đerdap 3 could significantly shape the energy landscape of the Balkans. With an estimated cost of several billion euros, this ambitious project involving Serbia and Romania has garnered interest from the USA, potentially impacting the entire European energy market. However, several challenges remain in its path.

Discussions regarding the construction of Đerdap 3 took place two years ago with the American company Bechtel. Currently, the project is in the final phase of its feasibility study, with completion anticipated no earlier than 2035, according to the Ministry of Mining and Energy. Veljko Kovačević, State Secretary at the ministry, mentioned to Euronews Serbia that they expect to finalize additional market simulations within the next month to assess the financial implications of this project alongside the existing Đerdap 1 and 2 plants.

The proposed hydroelectric plant on the Danube aims for a capacity of either 1,200, 1,800, or 2,400 megawatts, depending on negotiations with Romania. Kovačević noted that achieving a capacity of 1,800 megawatts would benefit Romania, while 2,400 megawatts could transform the region’s energy dynamics.

Supported by

Romania’s involvement as a key partner comes with specific conditions. The Romanian Ministry of Mining and Energy stated that the construction of Đerdap 3 should not negatively impact the existing Đerdap 1 and 2 plants and emphasized the importance of maintaining production and ecological balance.

Our inquiries to the Romanian Ministry of Energy for further comments have gone unanswered.

Experts also highlight other considerations. Journalist Jelica Putniković from “Energija Balkana” believes that Serbia stands to gain considerably from increased electricity capacity. However, she points out the need to evaluate potential reservoir locations, as Europe has largely exhausted its hydro potential.

Supported by

Putniković also noted Romania’s negotiating leverage stemming from historical disputes over the existing Đerdap plants. She recalled that Romania had not fully honored its obligations concerning Đerdap 1 and 2 during Tito’s era, which has led to lingering consequences for Serbia, including groundwater issues and damage to downstream settlements.

In summary, while Đerdap 3 presents a promising opportunity for regional energy cooperation, careful consideration of ecological impacts and historical context is crucial for its success.

Suppported byOwner's Engineer

Serbia grants €5.9 million subsidy for Marriott Hotel construction in preparation for EXPO 2027

The Ministry of Economy has awarded its first subsidy under a decree enacted at the end of last year, aimed at funding the construction...

Expiration of interest rate cap on housing loans may lead to higher payments for borrowers

As the end of the year approaches, the temporary cap on interest rates for housing loans is set to expire, and experts predict that...

Serbia’s real estate market sees record high prices and sales in Q2 2023

In Serbia, the second quarter of this year saw the highest apartment prices recorded in Belgrade, with the most expensive unit selling for €9,125...
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img
error: Content is protected !!