USAID funding in Serbia: Development initiatives and controversy

Since the new U.S. administration imposed restrictions on international development aid through USAID, a campaign has emerged accusing the agency of funding color revolutions and promoting “woke” ideology. Caroline Levitt, White House spokeswoman, highlighted USAID’s financial support for various initiatives, including $1.5 million for diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs in Serbia.

Despite claims that USAID funds left-wing NGOs, the majority of U.S. taxpayer money in Serbia has been directed to state institutions and development projects. According to reports, USAID has allocated over $1 billion to Serbia since 2001, supporting economic, democratic development and healthcare initiatives, with a special focus during the COVID-19 pandemic, where over $9 million was provided in assistance.

Notable suspended USAID projects include:

Supported by

1. Justice for All (2023-2028) – $9.9 million project aimed at strengthening Serbia’s judicial system and improving citizen access to justice.
2. Big Small Economy (2022-2027) – Focused on supporting small and medium-sized enterprises in agriculture and the food industry, with 1.7 million dinars allocated for young farmers in Kraljevo.
3. Media and Innovation (2022-2027) – Aimed at improving media sustainability and fostering digital transformation in Serbia.
4. Better Energy (2021-2026) – Promoted energy efficiency and renewable energy use at the municipal level.
5. Smart Specialization Strategy of Serbia (2020-2027) – Focused on enhancing operations and product design in companies with IT sector collaboration.

Other completed projects include support for digital skills, public procurement improvement, healthcare system strengthening, and the installation of solar panels to improve energy efficiency.

USAID, founded in 1961, is the world’s largest donor, providing over $72 billion in aid globally. Its initiatives span various sectors, including health, clean water access, and anti-corruption efforts. Despite criticism regarding political influence, the agency has remained a significant contributor to Serbia’s development across multiple sectors.